<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why rules often suck</title>
	<atom:link href="http://decisionvelocity.net/2009/01/23/why-rules-often-suck/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://decisionvelocity.net/2009/01/23/why-rules-often-suck/</link>
	<description>Make better decisions in a faster world</description>
	<pubDate>Fri, 30 Jul 2010 22:03:27 +0000</pubDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.6.3</generator>
		<item>
		<title>By: Timo Elliott</title>
		<link>http://decisionvelocity.net/2009/01/23/why-rules-often-suck/#comment-20</link>
		<dc:creator>Timo Elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 26 Jan 2009 13:26:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decisionvelocity.net/?p=151#comment-20</guid>
		<description>Many "rules that suck" are ridiculous attempts to categorize everything that might happen. 

For example, travel expense policies are an easy target -- they should be replaced by good reporting, analytics, and public rankings -- "Hmm... Why does these people only buy their tickets 2 days before each journey?" "Why does it cost this team twice as much, on average, to fly between the US and Europe?"</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Many &#8220;rules that suck&#8221; are ridiculous attempts to categorize everything that might happen. </p>
<p>For example, travel expense policies are an easy target &#8212; they should be replaced by good reporting, analytics, and public rankings &#8212; &#8220;Hmm&#8230; Why does these people only buy their tickets 2 days before each journey?&#8221; &#8220;Why does it cost this team twice as much, on average, to fly between the US and Europe?&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: david</title>
		<link>http://decisionvelocity.net/2009/01/23/why-rules-often-suck/#comment-19</link>
		<dc:creator>david</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 19:53:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decisionvelocity.net/?p=151#comment-19</guid>
		<description>Joe,

Totally agree.

I like your counter-argument, and it feels similar to the issue we both address constantly around social software: we can't use that, we'll lose control.  When they've already lost control as soon as they push people to work outside their tools.

I think we can get there, with the will and the passion.  Or, put more succinctly, Yes we can ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Joe,</p>
<p>Totally agree.</p>
<p>I like your counter-argument, and it feels similar to the issue we both address constantly around social software: we can&#8217;t use that, we&#8217;ll lose control.  When they&#8217;ve already lost control as soon as they push people to work outside their tools.</p>
<p>I think we can get there, with the will and the passion.  Or, put more succinctly, Yes we can <img src='http://decisionvelocity.net/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Joe</title>
		<link>http://decisionvelocity.net/2009/01/23/why-rules-often-suck/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>Joe</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 23 Jan 2009 17:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://decisionvelocity.net/?p=151#comment-18</guid>
		<description>So you know me as someone who is trying to eliminate the RTS and the stuff that sucks from the enterprise, but I've been faced with an interesting push-back when wanting to simply empower people and hold them accountable.

Often times, the cost of an error is greater than the price you can exact on the person who made that error.  They can't be held accountable for $1B in market cap, but they can hurt it.  In some cases the RTS are there to keep you from hurting more than yourself - like having to have car insurance.

My argument is typically:  A determined person can already extract &#62; $1B in market cap from you today.  The RTS aren't preventing that in the least.  What's really stopping it is (mostly) good judgment combined with some luck and relative obscurity.

I agree with the axiom of creating RTDS, but worry that the typical IT middle-mgt bureaucracy has been so successful at fear mongering for so long, that we may never get there.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So you know me as someone who is trying to eliminate the RTS and the stuff that sucks from the enterprise, but I&#8217;ve been faced with an interesting push-back when wanting to simply empower people and hold them accountable.</p>
<p>Often times, the cost of an error is greater than the price you can exact on the person who made that error.  They can&#8217;t be held accountable for $1B in market cap, but they can hurt it.  In some cases the RTS are there to keep you from hurting more than yourself - like having to have car insurance.</p>
<p>My argument is typically:  A determined person can already extract &gt; $1B in market cap from you today.  The RTS aren&#8217;t preventing that in the least.  What&#8217;s really stopping it is (mostly) good judgment combined with some luck and relative obscurity.</p>
<p>I agree with the axiom of creating RTDS, but worry that the typical IT middle-mgt bureaucracy has been so successful at fear mongering for so long, that we may never get there.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
